pouvez vous m'aider pour les morphs ?

[valy]

I turn to your valuable advice to find out they are the morph of the two juveniles of eight months, I desire them for sale on a stock exchange that takes place at home in France but I would not deceive me on morph , thank you in advance

n° 1



n° 2

[valy]

sorry for my bad english thank you

[that_girl]

I'd call the first one a flame and/or dalmation, and the second one a harlequin.

[Nadja]

1 is a flame dalmatian and 2 is a partial pinstripe harlequin.

[that_girl]

Originally Posted by Nadja

and 2 is a partial pinstripe harlequin.

Since not enough of the dorsal scales on the second are highlight, it would not be considered a partial pinstripe. It's just a harlequin.

[Nadja]

Originally Posted by that_girl

Since not enough of the dorsal scales on the second are highlight, it would not be considered a partial pinstripe. It's just a harlequin.

In my opinion it doesn't matter if they are highlighted or not.
There are raised scales and thus it is a partial pinstripe to me.
The phantom pinstripes aren't pinstripes to you either? Cause they aren't highlighted. It's the same. When there are clearly raised scales, I call it a pinner or partial one, either if they are white or not. But yes, they are preferred to be white, true that.

[Andrew Gilpin]

I would go with flame and harlequin as well.
I would agree that I wouldn't call the one a partial pinstripe. If you look at the scalation of the second one in question, the raised scales are not in obvious rows, but rather irregularly placed along the dorsum. I would also agree that something needs to have 50-60% partial pinstriping for it to be worthy of mentioning in a morph description.... otherwise 90% of the geckos being hatched out these days would be 'partial' pinstripes if you accounted for minimal raised scales along the dorsum or 10-20% highlighted scales in the appropriate places.